The recent Inferno remake in Counter-Strike 2 has become a hotbed of discussion, especially after a series of comments from professional players surfaced on Thour's Twitter. Esteemed players like EliGE, bymas, qikert, n0rb3r7, Keoz, and hs have openly shared their critiques, highlighting concerns over map tightness, skybox adjustments, utility limitations, and the contentious Banana area.
These professionals, alongside others such as Fessor, faven, shushan, and Thomas, have pinpointed specific areas where the remake falls short of expectations. The alterations to the map's architecture—namely, the heightened buildings and narrowed paths—have significantly impacted the game's strategic layer, particularly in utility use and site engagements.
The feedback doesn't stop there; more players like t0rick, smooya, meztal, and MiGHTYMAX have voiced their dissatisfaction, underscoring the remake's deviation from the classic Inferno's playability. The consensus suggests a longing for a map that supports a wider range of strategies and a more balanced experience for both attackers and defenders.
Leninw also collected comments on this topic from Ukrainian esports stars, he shared them on Telegram. Adding to the conversation, Ukrainian pros such as Ganginho, Sergiz, npl alongside bondik, have echoed similar sentiments. They highlight the increased difficulty in controlling key areas like mid and Banana, attributing these challenges to the map's reworked geometry and utility dynamics. Their feedback, rooted in extensive competitive experience, underscores the global impact of these changes on the pro scene.
As the debate unfolds, the detailed critiques from these seasoned players pave the way for potential adjustments. The community's hope is that Valve will take these concerns into account, working towards an Inferno remake that not only challenges but also enriches the strategic depth of Counter-Strike 2.
Source:t.me/leniniwtv, twitter.com/ThourCS2/
Comments