KPI Gaming Scoreboard

+/-

MAPS ACS

There are currently no data
Case Esports Scoreboard

+/-

MAPS ACS

There are currently no data
Clash.gg 3 cases
Lineups
  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

There are currently no team lineup
  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

There are currently no team lineup
Teams advantage

There are currently no games data
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months

Sunset

80%

Icebox

75%

Split

71%

Bind

43%

Breeze

17%

Haven

17%

Ascent

10%

Lotus

3%

Last 5 maps

Sunset

100%

2

w

Icebox

100%

4

w
w
w

Split

100%

6

w
w
w
w
w

Bind

57%

7

w
w
w
w
l

Breeze

50%

4

w
l
w

Haven

50%

2

w
l

Ascent

60%

5

w
w
l
w
l

Lotus

83%

6

w
w
l
w
w

Last 5 maps

Sunset

20%

5

l
l
w
l

Icebox

25%

4

l
l
w

Split

29%

7

w
l
l
l
w

Bind

100%

2

w

Breeze

67%

3

w
l

Haven

33%

3

w
l
l

Ascent

50%

4

l
w
l
w

Lotus

86%

7

w
w
w
w
w
Info
Match analysis of KPI Gaming vs Case Esports by the Bo3.gg Team

In the Valorant match between KPI Gaming and Case Esports, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 3-2, on the following maps: Bind, Icebox, Split, Breeze, Sunset, and victory was secured by KPI Gaming. The MVP of this match was .


KPI Gaming analytics

The team KPI Gaming secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Icebox, Split, Sunset. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.


The standout players for KPI Gaming were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.


On the defensive side, KPI Gaming held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


Case Esports analytics

The team Case Esports managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for Case Esports were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Case Esports could not prevent KPI Gaming from securing the victory


On the defensive side, Case Esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date