0 Comments
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- wlwww
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Abyss
100%
Ascent
75%
Haven
73%
Lotus
62%
Split
60%
Fracture
50%
Pearl
50%
Bind
0%
Icebox
0%
Last 5 maps
Abyss
0%
0
Ascent
75%
4
Haven
0%
6
Lotus
100%
7
Split
0%
3
Fracture
0%
1
Pearl
100%
2
Bind
0%
0
Icebox
60%
5
Last 5 maps
Abyss
100%
1
Ascent
0%
0
Haven
73%
11
Lotus
38%
13
Split
60%
5
Fracture
50%
2
Pearl
50%
4
Bind
0%
1
Icebox
60%
5
Info
Match analysis of Bitfix Gaming vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Bitfix Gaming and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-3, on the following maps: Lotus, Haven, Pearl, Split, Icebox, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was Razziss.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 60 out of 110 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Haven, Split, Icebox. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were Pyroll contributed 90 kills and alexiiik contributed 84 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 74956 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 38 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Bitfix Gaming analytics
The team Bitfix Gaming managed to secure 50 out of 110 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Bitfix Gaming were Razziss contributed 109 kills and qu1ckz contributed 85 kills. 69839 of total damage by Bitfix Gaming could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Bitfix Gaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 26 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments