0 Comentários
136
112
39
+24
401
21:17
32
4
Inferno6.1
+8%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:33s01:25s
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:31s01:25s
Danos por Deagle (média/rodada)
26.65.3
AK47 kills no mapa
106.5019
M4A1 kills no mapa
94.4189
Danos por M4A1 (média/rodada)
7016.3
USP mortas no mapa
31.6027
Dano por USP (média/rodada)
18.74.8
Galil kills no mapa
41.8164
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
215.9
Escalação
escalação
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
escalação
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Ancient
48%
Anubis
23%
Nuke
18%
Inferno
14%
Mirage
14%
Vertigo
6%
Dust II
4%
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
0%
0
78
Anubis
69%
101
0
Nuke
68%
37
3
Inferno
55%
31
12
Mirage
55%
44
19
Vertigo
37%
38
25
Dust II
54%
13
10
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
48%
25
5
Anubis
46%
24
12
Nuke
50%
2
38
Inferno
41%
27
4
Mirage
41%
17
10
Vertigo
31%
13
25
Dust II
50%
6
2
Últimos resultados
Partidas anteriores
- VlVlV
- lVlVl
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and EYEBALLERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 26 out of 38 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 31 kills and nEMANHA contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15033 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
EYEBALLERS analytics
The team EYEBALLERS managed to secure 12 out of 38 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS were HEAP contributed 31 kills and JW contributed 22 kills. 12588 of total damage by EYEBALLERS could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários