0 Comentários
115
154
42
-39
318
21:22
25
0
Inferno5.4
-14%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:34s01:26s
Porcentagem de tiros na cabeça
42%15%
M4A1 kills no mapa
114.491
Danos por M4A1 (média/rodada)
52.316.3
Fumaça lançada no mapa
2414.6931
Assistências em um mapa
12.964.4098
Eco ganha compra integral
1
Rodada rápida (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
37671011
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
35691011
Escalação
escalação
escalação
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Nuke
69%
Ancient
47%
Mirage
12%
Anubis
11%
Vertigo
5%
Dust II
4%
Inferno
2%
Últimos 5 mapas
Nuke
0%
1
32
Ancient
47%
19
6
Mirage
43%
14
10
Anubis
56%
18
14
Vertigo
31%
13
21
Dust II
40%
5
0
Inferno
48%
23
4
Últimos 5 mapas
Nuke
69%
42
3
Ancient
0%
0
77
Mirage
55%
42
20
Anubis
67%
96
0
Vertigo
36%
36
23
Dust II
44%
9
9
Inferno
50%
28
14
Últimos resultados
Partidas anteriores
- llVVV
- VVVlV
Info
Match analysis of EYEBALLERS vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between EYEBALLERS and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by EYEBALLERS. The MVP of this match was JW.
EYEBALLERS analytics
The team EYEBALLERS secured 26 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS were JW contributed 36 kills and Golden contributed 31 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16412 overall damage.
On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 17 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were nEMANHA contributed 24 kills and Cjoffo contributed 26 kills. 13661 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent EYEBALLERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários