0 Comentários
146
157
47
-11
353
24:22
35
4
Inferno5.6
-3%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Fumaça lançada no mapa
2314.6931
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
17.45.8
Fumaça lançada no mapa
2214.6931
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
40291011
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Clutch (adversários)
2
Dano coquetel molotov (total/rodada)
10023.8
Duração do flash numa rodada (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Duração do flash numa rodada (sec)
00:18s00:05s
HE kills no mapa
21.1227
Escalação
escalação
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
escalação
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Ancient
53%
Nuke
52%
Anubis
9%
Inferno
8%
Vertigo
8%
Mirage
2%
Dust II
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
0%
0
75
Nuke
69%
36
6
Anubis
58%
71
0
Inferno
56%
25
16
Vertigo
35%
31
18
Mirage
51%
37
20
Dust II
0%
2
1
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
53%
19
8
Nuke
17%
6
27
Anubis
67%
9
28
Inferno
64%
25
4
Vertigo
27%
11
16
Mirage
53%
15
7
Dust II
0%
0
0
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- VlVVV
- VlVlV
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and EYEBALLERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by EYEBALLERS. The MVP of this match was sapec.
EYEBALLERS analytics
The team EYEBALLERS secured 26 out of 46 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS were sapec contributed 36 kills and JW contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16587 overall damage.
On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 20 out of 46 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 34 kills and aVN contributed 34 kills. 16275 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent EYEBALLERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários