Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Eco wins full buy
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
HE damage (total/round)
9626.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:22s00:05s
Defuse at the last second
02:52s
Deagle damage (avg/round)
20.55.4
HE damage (avg/round)
11.93.4
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
60%
Nuke
46%
Vertigo
41%
Ancient
27%
Dust II
19%
Mirage
18%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
60%
20
4
Nuke
0%
0
53
Vertigo
91%
22
1
Ancient
60%
5
8
Dust II
66%
29
6
Mirage
79%
24
12
Inferno
72%
25
16
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
42
Nuke
46%
13
14
Vertigo
50%
18
5
Ancient
33%
3
5
Dust II
47%
17
5
Mirage
61%
23
1
Inferno
75%
24
2
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Gambit vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Gambit and G2, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Vertigo, Inferno, and victory was secured by G2. The MVP of this match was Ax1Le.
G2 analytics
The team G2 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for G2 were AMANEK contributed 56 kills and NiKo contributed 58 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29194 overall damage.
On the defensive side, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Gambit analytics
The team Gambit managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Gambit were Ax1Le contributed 66 kills and Hobbit contributed 63 kills. 30207 of total damage by Gambit could not prevent G2 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Gambit struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments