0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7830
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7830
Player score (round)
38341012
Player score (round)
44861012
Damage (total/round)
39873
Player score (round)
37821012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
60%
Overpass
50%
Train
50%
Vertigo
33%
Dust II
23%
Inferno
22%
Mirage
8%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
16
Overpass
50%
6
0
Train
75%
8
2
Vertigo
80%
5
1
Dust II
75%
4
4
Inferno
60%
5
5
Mirage
71%
7
5
Last 5 maps
Nuke
60%
20
8
Overpass
0%
5
37
Train
25%
12
25
Vertigo
47%
17
4
Dust II
52%
21
1
Inferno
38%
21
7
Mirage
63%
16
6
Info
Match analysis of Gambit vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Gambit and G2, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Dust II, and victory was secured by Gambit. The MVP of this match was sh1ro.
Gambit analytics
The team Gambit secured 32 out of 54 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Dust II. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Gambit were sh1ro contributed 52 kills and Hobbit contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20207 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
G2 analytics
The team G2 managed to secure 22 out of 54 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for G2 were NiKo contributed 40 kills and kennyS contributed 34 kills. 17713 of total damage by G2 could not prevent Gambit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments