Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
51.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
215.4
Deagle kills on a map
51.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
17.45.4
Decoy grenades thrown
51.291
HE kills on a map
31.127
HE damage (avg/round)
14.53.4
Player score (round)
36331012
Clutch (opponents)
3
HE damage (total/round)
10226.8







Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
58%
Nuke
58%
Train
45%
Mirage
29%
Vertigo
25%
Dust II
20%
Inferno
10%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
58%
12
1
Nuke
0%
0
26
Train
78%
9
6
Mirage
89%
9
6
Vertigo
75%
12
1
Dust II
73%
11
6
Inferno
71%
14
8
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
35
Nuke
58%
12
9
Train
33%
9
20
Mirage
60%
20
0
Vertigo
50%
14
4
Dust II
53%
17
2
Inferno
61%
18
5
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Gambit vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Gambit and G2, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Gambit. The MVP of this match was Hobbit.
Gambit analytics
The team Gambit secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Gambit were Hobbit contributed 44 kills and nafany contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19517 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
G2 analytics
The team G2 managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for G2 were NiKo contributed 41 kills and huNter- contributed 33 kills. 16094 of total damage by G2 could not prevent Gambit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments