Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A4 kills on a map
113.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
53.312.7
USP damage (avg/round)
13.64.6
Deagle damage (avg/round)
22.45.4
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
133.4
HE kills on a map
21.127
Speed Round (sec)
00:28s01:54s
Shots (total/round)
11816
Shots (total/round)
8516
Player score (round)
36831012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Nuke
58%
Dust II
21%
Mirage
14%
Ancient
13%
Vertigo
5%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
67%
21
2
Nuke
0%
0
47
Dust II
44%
16
12
Mirage
41%
17
11
Ancient
54%
13
7
Vertigo
61%
18
5
Inferno
53%
30
5
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
51
Nuke
58%
24
12
Dust II
65%
23
8
Mirage
55%
22
5
Ancient
67%
21
1
Vertigo
56%
18
13
Inferno
50%
18
15
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Endpoint vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Endpoint and AGO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Inferno, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was F1KU.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 32 out of 49 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Inferno. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were F1KU contributed 47 kills and rallen contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20171 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint managed to secure 17 out of 49 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Endpoint were BOROS contributed 50 kills and Thomas contributed 27 kills. 16714 of total damage by Endpoint could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments