Ended
Full stats

0 Comments

Endpoint Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

33

20

5

+13

114

6:2

12

0

8.5

+30%

19

20

6

-1

88

3:1

4

1

6.7

+4%

15

16

5

-1

60

2:2

3

0

5.6

-1%

12

19

6

-7

62

2:4

2

0

5.0

-15%

9

21

3

-12

38

1:4

2

0

4.1

-42%

Total

88

96

25

-8

362

14:13

23

1

6.0

-5%

AGO Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

17

3

+11

105

6:4

7

0

7.8

+24%

24

18

4

+6

100

2:1

7

1

7.3

+20%

18

19

8

-1

78

0:3

5

1

6.3

+10%

17

16

2

+1

59

4:2

2

0

5.8

-12%

9

18

1

-9

41

1:4

1

0

4.2

-30%

Total

96

88

18

+8

383

13:14

22

2

6.3

+2%

Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Endpoint vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team

AGO on Dust II Analysis

AGO demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AGO on Dust II were rallen, who contributed 28 kills, and F1KU, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10328 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Endpoint on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Endpoint, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Endpoint on Dust II included BOROS, who contributed 33 kills, and Thomas, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9767 total damage, Endpoint couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date