0 Comments
205
145
46
+60
433
32:20
51
3
Anubis6.4
+20%
Teams advantage
Score
5.1
7
Anubis0.7
Win Rounds
17
35
Anubis4
Kills
144
205
Anubis10
Damage
16.69K
21.66K
Anubis962
Economy
1.08M
1.24M
Anubis-7100
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle damage (avg/round)
19.45.4
Smoke thrown on a map
1715.0371
M4A1 kills on a map
94.6963
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:30s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5830
Smoke thrown on a map
1615.0371
AWP kills on a map
166.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
86.221.6
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.13.8
USP kills on a map
31.616
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
b
100%
Vertigo
56%
Anubis
56%
Nuke
53%
Inferno
b
50%
Overpass
44%
Mirage
22%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
2
Nuke
0%
0
2
Inferno
100%
2
0
Overpass
0%
0
2
Mirage
33%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
43
Vertigo
56%
18
20
Anubis
56%
16
5
Nuke
53%
34
2
Inferno
50%
28
7
Overpass
44%
18
8
Mirage
55%
33
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- ww
- llwww
Info
Match analysis of beers vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between beers and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Anubis, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 35 out of 52 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 50 kills and Cjoffo contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21661 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
beers analytics
The team beers managed to secure 17 out of 52 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for beers were susp contributed 35 kills and fleav contributed 27 kills. 16690 of total damage by beers could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, beers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments