beers Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

24

4

+4

92

4:5

9

0

6.6

+7%

23

29

8

-6

79

4:3

6

0

5.9

-1%

21

23

7

-2

71

3:5

4

1

5.9

+12%

19

19

3

0

59

2:4

3

0

5.3

-16%

17

23

4

-6

50

1:3

3

1

5.0

-12%

Total

108

118

26

-10

350

14:20

25

2

5.7

-2%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

20

5

+8

76

9:4

7

1

7.2

+15%

24

20

7

+4

78

2:3

9

0

6.4

+11%

25

25

5

0

82

4:2

3

0

6.4

+6%

21

22

9

-1

78

1:3

5

0

6.1

+5%

20

21

4

-1

64

4:2

3

1

6.0

-6%

Total

118

108

30

+10

379

20:14

27

2

6.4

+6%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of beers vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 19 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were brutmonster, who contributed 28 kills, and aVN, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 12869 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


beers on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for beers, as they managed to secure 15 out of 34 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for beers on Anubis included susp, who contributed 28 kills, and dan1, who added 23 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11907 total damage, beers couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, beers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date