0 Kommentare
205
145
46
+60
433
32:20
51
3
Anubis6.4
+20%
Teams Vorteil
Punktzahl
5.1
7
Anubis0.7
Gewinn Runden
17
35
Anubis4
Tötungen
144
205
Anubis10
Schaden
16.69K
21.66K
Anubis962
Ökonomie
1.08M
1.24M
Anubis-7100
LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Deagle Schaden (avg/round)
19.45.4
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
1715.0371
M4A1 Kills auf der Karte
94.6963
Flash Dauer auf der Karte (sec)
01:30s00:39s
Flash geblendet auf der Karte (opp)
5830
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
1615.0371
AWP Kills auf der Karte
166.5798
AWP Schaden (avg/round)
86.221.6
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
11.13.8
USP Kills auf der Karte
31.616
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Ancient
b
100%
Vertigo
56%
Anubis
56%
Nuke
53%
Inferno
b
50%
Overpass
44%
Mirage
22%
Letzte 5 Karten
Ancient
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
2
Nuke
0%
0
2
Inferno
100%
2
0
Overpass
0%
0
2
Mirage
33%
3
0
Letzte 5 Karten
Ancient
0%
0
43
Vertigo
56%
18
20
Anubis
56%
16
5
Nuke
53%
34
2
Inferno
50%
28
7
Overpass
44%
18
8
Mirage
55%
33
3
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
- ww
- llwww
Info
Match analysis of beers vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between beers and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Anubis, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 35 out of 52 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 50 kills and Cjoffo contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21661 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
beers analytics
The team beers managed to secure 17 out of 52 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for beers were susp contributed 35 kills and fleav contributed 27 kills. 16690 of total damage by beers could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, beers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare