0 Comments
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- wlwll
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Fracture
100%
Bind
100%
Pearl
100%
Ascent
75%
Sunset
50%
Abyss
25%
Lotus
21%
Haven
8%
Split
0%
Last 5 maps
Fracture
100%
1
Bind
100%
2
Pearl
0%
0
Ascent
0%
0
Sunset
0%
0
Abyss
75%
4
Lotus
50%
2
Haven
25%
4
Split
0%
2
Last 5 maps
Fracture
0%
1
Bind
0%
2
Pearl
100%
1
Ascent
75%
4
Sunset
50%
2
Abyss
50%
4
Lotus
71%
7
Haven
33%
6
Split
0%
0
Info
Match analysis of Zerance Mint vs ALTERNATE aTTaX Ruby by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Zerance Mint and ALTERNATE aTTaX Ruby, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Abyss, Lotus, Haven, and victory was secured by Zerance Mint. The MVP of this match was Akita.
Zerance Mint analytics
The team Zerance Mint secured 37 out of 74 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Abyss, Haven. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zerance Mint were Akita contributed 74 kills and Thuy contributed 52 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 48083 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zerance Mint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ALTERNATE aTTaX Ruby analytics
The team ALTERNATE aTTaX Ruby managed to secure 37 out of 74 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX Ruby were ellie1 contributed 58 kills and Jade1 contributed 54 kills. 48789 of total damage by ALTERNATE aTTaX Ruby could not prevent Zerance Mint from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ALTERNATE aTTaX Ruby struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments