0 Comments
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlww
- lwwww
Teams advantage
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Bind
100%
Pearl
78%
Haven
55%
Split
50%
Breeze
50%
Icebox
30%
Lotus
10%
Ascent
3%
Fracture
0%
Last 5 maps
Bind
0%
0
Pearl
22%
9
Haven
45%
11
Split
0%
0
Breeze
0%
0
Icebox
50%
2
Lotus
50%
2
Ascent
40%
10
Fracture
33%
3
Last 5 maps
Bind
100%
1
Pearl
100%
1
Haven
100%
4
Split
50%
2
Breeze
50%
2
Icebox
80%
5
Lotus
40%
5
Ascent
43%
7
Fracture
33%
3
Info
Match analysis of The Who Plus Two vs Funcrew by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between The Who Plus Two and Funcrew, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Lotus, Ascent, Haven, and victory was secured by The Who Plus Two. The MVP of this match was .
The Who Plus Two analytics
The team The Who Plus Two secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Lotus, Ascent. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for The Who Plus Two were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, The Who Plus Two held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Funcrew analytics
The team Funcrew managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Funcrew were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Funcrew could not prevent The Who Plus Two from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Funcrew struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments