0 Comments
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwlw
- lwlww
Teams advantage
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Bind
83%
Lotus
67%
Split
50%
Icebox
50%
Ascent
49%
Haven
33%
Abyss
33%
Sunset
23%
Breeze
0%
Last 5 maps
Bind
83%
6
Lotus
0%
1
Split
50%
2
Icebox
50%
4
Ascent
33%
3
Haven
83%
6
Abyss
33%
3
Sunset
86%
7
Breeze
0%
1
Last 5 maps
Bind
0%
2
Lotus
67%
3
Split
0%
1
Icebox
100%
4
Ascent
82%
11
Haven
50%
4
Abyss
0%
2
Sunset
63%
8
Breeze
0%
1
Info
Match analysis of Team Falcons VEGA vs GIANTX GC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Team Falcons VEGA and GIANTX GC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Icebox, Haven, Ascent, and victory was secured by GIANTX GC. The MVP of this match was .
GIANTX GC analytics
The team GIANTX GC secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Icebox, Ascent. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GIANTX GC were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GIANTX GC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Team Falcons VEGA analytics
The team Team Falcons VEGA managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Team Falcons VEGA were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Team Falcons VEGA could not prevent GIANTX GC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Team Falcons VEGA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments