0 Comments
146
93
71
+53
753
21:13
38
2
Haven249
235
+20%
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Lineup
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlllw
- wlw
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Fracture
100%
Bind
100%
Pearl
100%
Lotus
67%
Haven
60%
Ascent
50%
Split
50%
Abyss
0%
Last 5 maps
Fracture
0%
0
Bind
0%
0
Pearl
100%
1
Lotus
0%
1
Haven
60%
5
Ascent
50%
2
Split
50%
4
Abyss
50%
2
Last 5 maps
Fracture
100%
1
Bind
100%
1
Pearl
0%
1
Lotus
67%
3
Haven
0%
2
Ascent
0%
0
Split
0%
0
Abyss
50%
2
Info
Match analysis of Sengoku Gaming vs Murash Gaming by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Sengoku Gaming and Murash Gaming, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Haven, Abyss, and victory was secured by Sengoku Gaming. The MVP of this match was Gwangboong.
Sengoku Gaming analytics
The team Sengoku Gaming secured 26 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Haven, Abyss. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sengoku Gaming were Gwangboong contributed 39 kills and Yuran contributed 31 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25600 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sengoku Gaming held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Murash Gaming analytics
The team Murash Gaming managed to secure 8 out of 34 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Murash Gaming were Reita contributed 21 kills and Absol contributed 20 kills. 18033 of total damage by Murash Gaming could not prevent Sengoku Gaming from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Murash Gaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments