Olimpo Scoreboard Bind (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS ACS

Brimstone

18

14

9

+4

134

2:1

5

1

222

+3%

Skye

17

16

3

+1

116

0:5

4

0

193

+7%

Viper

16

16

4

0

131

3:2

5

1

180

+3%

Raze

13

20

3

-7

119

4:4

3

0

178

-11%

Sage

11

15

8

-4

104

1:2

3

0

164

+4%

Total

75

81

27

-6

604

10:14

20

2

187

+1%

CO-OP Scoreboard Bind (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS ACS

MVP

Skye

23

17

5

+6

173

5:2

7

0

277

+15%

Raze

17

14

6

+3

161

3:2

5

0

217

+24%

Brimstone

14

16

8

-2

118

2:3

3

0

176

-6%

Viper

14

12

5

+2

110

1:0

4

1

168

+10%

Yoru

13

16

5

-3

112

3:3

2

0

161

-13%

Total

81

75

29

+6

674

14:10

21

1

200

+6%

Teams advantage Bind (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Olimpo vs CO-OP by the Bo3.gg Team

CO-OP on Bind Analysis

CO-OP demonstrated their prowers on Bind, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CO-OP on Bind were ntk, who contributed 23 kills, and fzkk, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Bind, the team inflicted a total of 16170 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Bind, CO-OP held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Olimpo on Bind Analysis

Bind proved to be a challenging battleground for Olimpo, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Olimpo on Bind included Chase, who contributed 18 kills, and shion, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 14490 total damage, Olimpo couldn't prevent CO-OP from securing victory on Bind


On the defensive side of Bind, Olimpo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date