0 Comments
176
221
86
-45
605
31:26
42
4
Pearl204
183
+5%
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllwl
- wllll
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Abyss
100%
Ascent
75%
Split
67%
Fracture
67%
Sunset
50%
Bind
40%
Haven
17%
Lotus
8%
Pearl
8%
Icebox
0%
Last 5 maps
Abyss
100%
2
Ascent
75%
4
Split
33%
3
Fracture
0%
3
Sunset
50%
2
Bind
40%
5
Haven
17%
6
Lotus
33%
6
Pearl
25%
4
Icebox
0%
1
Last 5 maps
Abyss
0%
1
Ascent
0%
0
Split
100%
1
Fracture
67%
3
Sunset
0%
0
Bind
0%
2
Haven
0%
5
Lotus
25%
4
Pearl
33%
3
Icebox
0%
0
Info
Match analysis of NASR Ignite vs Lunar by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between NASR Ignite and Lunar, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Pearl, Split, Fracture, and victory was secured by Lunar. The MVP of this match was Liza.
Lunar analytics
The team Lunar secured 37 out of 57 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Split, Fracture. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Lunar were Liza contributed 54 kills and elsie contributed 56 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 38835 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Lunar held their ground firmly, successfully defending 24 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NASR Ignite analytics
The team NASR Ignite managed to secure 20 out of 57 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NASR Ignite were ikyoo contributed 44 kills and SUPERPHROG contributed 40 kills. 34449 of total damage by NASR Ignite could not prevent Lunar from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NASR Ignite struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments