0 Comments
70
49
21
+21
761
7:9
19
3
Lotus236
236
+10%
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- —
- Starter
Lineup
Last results
Past matches
- wlllw
- wwwwl
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Fracture
100%
Breeze
100%
Split
83%
Bind
67%
Haven
60%
Pearl
25%
Lotus
17%
Ascent
10%
Icebox
4%
Last 5 maps
Fracture
0%
1
Breeze
100%
3
Split
83%
6
Bind
67%
3
Haven
40%
5
Pearl
75%
8
Lotus
67%
3
Ascent
73%
11
Icebox
60%
10
Last 5 maps
Fracture
100%
4
Breeze
0%
0
Split
0%
1
Bind
0%
2
Haven
100%
5
Pearl
100%
2
Lotus
50%
4
Ascent
83%
12
Icebox
64%
14
Info
Match analysis of NASR Esports vs Team RA'AD by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between NASR Esports and Team RA'AD, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Lotus, and victory was secured by NASR Esports. The MVP of this match was falltw.
NASR Esports analytics
The team NASR Esports secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Lotus. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NASR Esports were avez contributed 18 kills and sibeastw0w contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12180 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NASR Esports held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Team RA'AD analytics
The team Team RA'AD managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Team RA'AD were falltw contributed 16 kills and neveR contributed 12 kills. 9540 of total damage by Team RA'AD could not prevent NASR Esports from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Team RA'AD struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments