LOUD Scoreboard Haven (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS ACS

Jett

25

13

7

+12

165

3:4

6

0

262

+18%

Skye

23

15

15

+8

149

3:2

5

1

254

+16%

Harbor

20

13

14

+7

142

0:2

5

0

205

+24%

Viper

14

17

5

-3

101

4:4

3

0

172

-9%

Killjoy

9

16

1

-7

101

0:2

0

0

110

-32%

Total

91

74

42

+17

658

10:14

19

1

201

+3%

MIBR Scoreboard Haven (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS ACS

Raze

19

18

6

+1

167

6:4

6

0

236

+4%

Omen

18

17

9

+1

133

2:0

4

0

216

+7%

Killjoy

14

17

5

-3

155

4:3

4

0

201

+6%

Fade

14

15

6

-1

108

1:2

4

1

163

-3%

Breach

11

17

11

-6

84

1:1

2

1

134

-17%

Total

76

84

37

-8

647

14:10

20

2

190

-1%

Teams advantage Haven (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of LOUD vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

LOUD on Haven Analysis

LOUD demonstrated their prowers on Haven, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for LOUD on Haven were aspas, who contributed 25 kills, and cauanzin, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Haven, the team inflicted a total of 15776 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Haven, LOUD held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Haven Analysis

Haven proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Haven included heat, who contributed 19 kills, and rglmeister, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 15520 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent LOUD from securing victory on Haven


On the defensive side of Haven, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date