0 Comments
102
105
53
-3
655
16:14
22
2
Haven194
194
-9%
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- —
- Starter
- Starter
- —
Lineup
Last results
Past matches
- wwwwl
- lllwl
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Bind
100%
Pearl
86%
Split
40%
Ascent
39%
Breeze
33%
Icebox
24%
Lotus
17%
Haven
6%
Last 5 maps
Bind
100%
2
Pearl
86%
7
Split
57%
7
Ascent
50%
6
Breeze
0%
0
Icebox
80%
10
Lotus
33%
3
Haven
73%
11
Last 5 maps
Bind
0%
0
Pearl
0%
2
Split
17%
6
Ascent
11%
9
Breeze
33%
3
Icebox
56%
9
Lotus
50%
2
Haven
67%
9
Info
Match analysis of Geekay Esports vs FATE Esports by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Geekay Esports and FATE Esports, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Haven, and victory was secured by FATE Esports. The MVP of this match was siJk.
FATE Esports analytics
The team FATE Esports secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Haven. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FATE Esports were siJk contributed 27 kills and zyad contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19850 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FATE Esports held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Geekay Esports analytics
The team Geekay Esports managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Geekay Esports were Rocket contributed 26 kills and Winteryrook contributed 24 kills. 19676 of total damage by Geekay Esports could not prevent FATE Esports from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Geekay Esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments