Gamax Esports Scoreboard Lotus (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS ACS

There are currently no data
Onyx Ravens Scoreboard Lotus (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS ACS

There are currently no data
SkinClub Worldwide
Lineups
  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

There are currently no team lineup
  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

There are currently no team lineup
Last results
Head to head
The teams have not met in the last 6 months
Past matches
Teams advantage Lotus (M1)
There are currently no game data
Info
Map Analysis of Gamax Esports vs Onyx Ravens by the Bo3.gg Team

Onyx Ravens on Lotus Analysis

Onyx Ravens demonstrated their prowers on Lotus, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Onyx Ravens on Lotus were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Lotus, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Lotus, Onyx Ravens held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Gamax Esports on Lotus Analysis

Lotus proved to be a challenging battleground for Gamax Esports, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Gamax Esports on Lotus included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Gamax Esports couldn't prevent Onyx Ravens from securing victory on Lotus


On the defensive side of Lotus, Gamax Esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date