176
141
62
+35
661
27:20
44
1
Split209
205
+9%
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- lllll
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Fracture
100%
Haven
75%
Bind
50%
Abyss
50%
Lotus
47%
Split
43%
Pearl
42%
Ascent
13%
Icebox
0%
Last 5 maps
Fracture
100%
4
Haven
75%
4
Bind
50%
4
Abyss
50%
2
Lotus
67%
6
Split
43%
7
Pearl
75%
4
Ascent
20%
5
Icebox
0%
2
Last 5 maps
Fracture
0%
0
Haven
0%
2
Bind
0%
0
Abyss
0%
1
Lotus
20%
5
Split
0%
4
Pearl
33%
3
Ascent
33%
3
Icebox
0%
1
Info
Match analysis of FUT Esports vs Apeks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between FUT Esports and Apeks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Split, Lotus, and victory was secured by FUT Esports. The MVP of this match was SimonD4rk.
FUT Esports analytics
The team FUT Esports secured 26 out of 47 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Split, Lotus. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FUT Esports were xeus contributed 43 kills and ATA contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31081 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FUT Esports held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Apeks analytics
The team Apeks managed to secure 21 out of 47 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Apeks were SimonD4rk contributed 47 kills and batujnax contributed 34 kills. 26720 of total damage by Apeks could not prevent FUT Esports from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Apeks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments