0 Comments
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- wlwll
Teams advantage
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Fracture
100%
Icebox
100%
Lotus
67%
Sunset
60%
Ascent
50%
Split
33%
Abyss
27%
Pearl
25%
Bind
10%
Haven
7%
Last 5 maps
Fracture
100%
1
Icebox
100%
1
Lotus
67%
3
Sunset
60%
5
Ascent
50%
4
Split
33%
3
Abyss
40%
5
Pearl
100%
2
Bind
40%
5
Haven
67%
6
Last 5 maps
Fracture
0%
2
Icebox
0%
0
Lotus
0%
0
Sunset
0%
1
Ascent
100%
1
Split
0%
1
Abyss
67%
3
Pearl
75%
4
Bind
50%
2
Haven
60%
5
Info
Match analysis of FULL SENSE vs The MongolZ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between FULL SENSE and The MongolZ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Abyss, Fracture, and victory was secured by FULL SENSE. The MVP of this match was .
FULL SENSE analytics
The team FULL SENSE secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Abyss, Fracture. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FULL SENSE were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FULL SENSE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
The MongolZ analytics
The team The MongolZ managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for The MongolZ were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by The MongolZ could not prevent FULL SENSE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, The MongolZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments