0 Comments
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwwl
- wwlww
Teams advantage
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Icebox
100%
Sunset
100%
Ascent
67%
Haven
67%
Lotus
60%
Fracture
33%
Bind
33%
Split
27%
Pearl
0%
Last 5 maps
Icebox
100%
2
Sunset
0%
2
Ascent
33%
3
Haven
100%
3
Lotus
40%
5
Fracture
67%
3
Bind
67%
6
Split
40%
5
Pearl
100%
1
Last 5 maps
Icebox
0%
2
Sunset
100%
1
Ascent
100%
3
Haven
33%
3
Lotus
100%
5
Fracture
100%
1
Bind
100%
4
Split
67%
3
Pearl
100%
1
Info
Match analysis of FlyQuest RED vs Wadadaa by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between FlyQuest RED and Wadadaa, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ascent, Sunset, and victory was secured by Wadadaa. The MVP of this match was .
Wadadaa analytics
The team Wadadaa secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ascent, Sunset. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Wadadaa were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Wadadaa held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FlyQuest RED analytics
The team FlyQuest RED managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FlyQuest RED were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by FlyQuest RED could not prevent Wadadaa from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FlyQuest RED struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments