0 Comments
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwww
- lwwww
Teams advantage
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Bind
100%
Ascent
43%
Split
33%
Haven
21%
Fracture
17%
Lotus
17%
Icebox
3%
Pearl
0%
Last 5 maps
Bind
100%
1
Ascent
86%
7
Split
100%
1
Haven
50%
4
Fracture
50%
4
Lotus
67%
3
Icebox
80%
5
Pearl
0%
1
Last 5 maps
Bind
0%
0
Ascent
43%
7
Split
67%
3
Haven
71%
7
Fracture
67%
3
Lotus
50%
2
Icebox
83%
6
Pearl
0%
1
Info
Match analysis of Fire Flux Esports vs S2G Esports by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Fire Flux Esports and S2G Esports, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-3, on the following maps: Haven, Lotus, Icebox, Fracture, and victory was secured by S2G Esports. The MVP of this match was .
S2G Esports analytics
The team S2G Esports secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Haven, Lotus, Fracture. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for S2G Esports were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, S2G Esports held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Fire Flux Esports analytics
The team Fire Flux Esports managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Fire Flux Esports were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Fire Flux Esports could not prevent S2G Esports from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Fire Flux Esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments