0 Comments
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- llwll
Teams advantage
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Split
67%
Icebox
50%
Haven
50%
Sunset
50%
Ascent
40%
Breeze
33%
Lotus
33%
Bind
17%
Last 5 maps
Split
0%
0
Icebox
0%
1
Haven
100%
1
Sunset
0%
2
Ascent
100%
1
Breeze
0%
1
Lotus
0%
2
Bind
50%
2
Last 5 maps
Split
67%
3
Icebox
50%
6
Haven
50%
2
Sunset
50%
4
Ascent
60%
5
Breeze
33%
3
Lotus
33%
6
Bind
33%
6
Info
Match analysis of Eternal Fire vs Fenerbahçe Esports by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Eternal Fire and Fenerbahçe Esports, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Lotus, Haven, Ascent, and victory was secured by Eternal Fire. The MVP of this match was .
Eternal Fire analytics
The team Eternal Fire secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Haven, Ascent. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Fenerbahçe Esports analytics
The team Fenerbahçe Esports managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Fenerbahçe Esports were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Fenerbahçe Esports could not prevent Eternal Fire from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Fenerbahçe Esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments