EBRO Scoreboard Ascent (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS ACS

KAY/O

26

15

7

+11

180

2:1

8

0

280

+34%

Killjoy

19

17

10

+2

164

3:2

4

0

249

+21%

Jett

18

21

1

-3

125

7:2

4

0

219

-16%

Sova

13

15

6

-2

128

2:3

2

0

156

+4%

Omen

6

18

5

-12

70

1:1

0

0

93

-37%

Total

82

86

29

-4

667

15:9

18

0

199

+1%

OXEN Scoreboard Ascent (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS ACS

Skye

25

16

8

+9

175

2:4

6

1

287

+13%

Killjoy

18

14

5

+4

167

4:1

5

0

227

+32%

Viper

18

17

7

+1

147

0:2

5

0

207

+1%

Jett

17

15

3

+2

119

3:8

4

0

181

+1%

Omen

10

17

15

-7

93

0:0

3

0

159

-20%

Total

88

79

38

+9

701

9:15

23

1

212

+5%

Teams advantage Ascent (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of EBRO vs OXEN by the Bo3.gg Team

OXEN on Ascent Analysis

OXEN demonstrated their prowers on Ascent, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for OXEN on Ascent were Forcee, who contributed 25 kills, and KIMB0, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ascent, the team inflicted a total of 16827 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ascent, OXEN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EBRO on Ascent Analysis

Ascent proved to be a challenging battleground for EBRO, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EBRO on Ascent included Haitam, who contributed 26 kills, and CrayZ, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 16019 total damage, EBRO couldn't prevent OXEN from securing victory on Ascent


On the defensive side of Ascent, EBRO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date