0 Comments
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwww
- wlwwl
Teams advantage
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Fracture
100%
Icebox
100%
Abyss
100%
Bind
50%
Lotus
50%
Split
39%
Pearl
30%
Haven
13%
Ascent
0%
Sunset
0%
Last 5 maps
Fracture
0%
1
Icebox
0%
0
Abyss
100%
3
Bind
100%
6
Lotus
0%
1
Split
89%
9
Pearl
50%
6
Haven
50%
4
Ascent
0%
2
Sunset
75%
4
Last 5 maps
Fracture
100%
1
Icebox
100%
1
Abyss
0%
0
Bind
50%
4
Lotus
50%
4
Split
50%
2
Pearl
20%
5
Haven
63%
8
Ascent
0%
1
Sunset
75%
4
Info
Match analysis of Alter Ego vs NAOS Esports by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Alter Ego and NAOS Esports, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Fracture, Haven, Bind, and victory was secured by Alter Ego. The MVP of this match was .
Alter Ego analytics
The team Alter Ego secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Haven, Bind. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Alter Ego were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Alter Ego held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NAOS Esports analytics
The team NAOS Esports managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NAOS Esports were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by NAOS Esports could not prevent Alter Ego from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NAOS Esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments