0 Kommentare
146
157
47
-11
353
24:22
35
4
Inferno5.6
0%
Teams Vorteil
LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
2314.6931
Galil Schaden (avg/round)
17.45.8
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
2214.6931
Spieler Punktzahl (round)
40291011
Multi-Tötungen x-
4
Kupplung (opponents)
2
Molotov Schaden (total/round)
10023.8
Flash Dauer pro Runde (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Flash Dauer pro Runde (sec)
00:18s00:05s
HE Tötungen auf der Karte
21.1227
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Aufstellung
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Ancient
53%
Nuke
52%
Anubis
9%
Inferno
8%
Vertigo
8%
Mirage
2%
Dust II
0%
Letzte 5 Karten
Ancient
0%
0
75
Nuke
69%
36
6
Anubis
58%
71
0
Inferno
56%
25
16
Vertigo
35%
31
18
Mirage
51%
37
20
Dust II
0%
2
1
Letzte 5 Karten
Ancient
53%
19
8
Nuke
17%
6
27
Anubis
67%
9
28
Inferno
64%
25
4
Vertigo
27%
11
16
Mirage
53%
15
7
Dust II
0%
0
0
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
- wlwww
- wlwlw
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and EYEBALLERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by EYEBALLERS. The MVP of this match was sapec.
EYEBALLERS analytics
The team EYEBALLERS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS were sapec contributed 36 kills and JW contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16587 overall damage.
On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 34 kills and aVN contributed 34 kills. 16275 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent EYEBALLERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare