0 Komentarze
RekordyMecz
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Zabójstwa za pomocą M4A1 na mapie
84.3478
Zabójstwa za pomocą USP na mapie
31.5986
Zabójstwa na mapie
22.9516.7206
Asysty na mapie
9.014.4746
Obrażenia (avg/round)
149.41847.8
Wymiany na mapie
10.033.3972
Zdobyte zabójstwa na mapie
6.972.804
Szybka Runda (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Vertigo
86%
Anubis
75%
Inferno
67%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
50%
Dust II
43%
Mirage
17%
Ostatnie 5 map
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
33%
6
0
Dust II
0%
0
1
Mirage
67%
3
0
Ostatnie 5 map
Vertigo
86%
7
0
Anubis
75%
8
1
Inferno
67%
3
0
Nuke
0%
0
5
Ancient
83%
6
3
Dust II
43%
7
2
Mirage
50%
4
0
Informacja
Match analysis of Haspers vs Fire Flux by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Haspers and Fire Flux, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Fire Flux. The MVP of this match was soulfly.
Fire Flux analytics
The team Fire Flux secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fire Flux were soulfly contributed 23 kills and Banjo contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7500 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fire Flux held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Haspers analytics
The team Haspers managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Haspers were bajmi contributed 12 kills and AdrieN contributed 10 kills. 5324 of total damage by Haspers could not prevent Fire Flux from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Haspers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze