Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3014
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Assists on a map
114.4315
Speed Round (sec)
00:21s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
39273
Clutch (opponents)
2
Zeus kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Vertigo
50%
Anubis
Z
46%
Inferno
Z
7%
Mirage
7%
Ancient
Z
7%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
89%
9
0
Inferno
57%
7
0
Mirage
50%
4
0
Ancient
63%
8
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
0
Vertigo
50%
2
1
Anubis
43%
14
0
Inferno
50%
6
0
Mirage
57%
7
0
Ancient
56%
16
0
Nuke
50%
2
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- wlwlw
Info
Match analysis of ZEROvariant vs Leo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ZEROvariant and Leo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by ZEROvariant. The MVP of this match was hahanz0.
ZEROvariant analytics
The team ZEROvariant secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ZEROvariant were hahanz0 contributed 20 kills and H4SAN4TOR contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9012 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ZEROvariant held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Leo analytics
The team Leo managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Leo were Malkiss contributed 14 kills and kL1o contributed 15 kills. 8037 of total damage by Leo could not prevent ZEROvariant from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Leo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments