Teams advantage Ancient (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Vertigo
50%
Anubis
46%
Inferno
7%
Mirage
7%
Ancient
7%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
89%
9
0
Inferno
57%
7
0
Mirage
50%
4
0
Ancient
63%
8
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
0
Vertigo
50%
2
1
Anubis
43%
14
0
Inferno
50%
6
0
Mirage
57%
7
0
Ancient
56%
16
0
Nuke
50%
2
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- wlwlw
Info
Map Analysis of ZEROvariant vs L&G by the Bo3.gg Team
ZEROvariant on Ancient Analysis
ZEROvariant demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ZEROvariant on Ancient were hahanz0, who contributed 20 kills, and H4SAN4TOR, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 9012 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, ZEROvariant held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
L&G on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for L&G, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for L&G on Ancient included Malkiss, who contributed 14 kills, and kL1okL1o, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8037 total damage, L&G couldn't prevent ZEROvariant from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, L&G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments