306
312
55
-6
374
48:42
74
5
Nuke5.4
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
48%
Ancient
46%
Inferno
42%
Dust II
32%
Nuke
30%
Vertigo
10%
Overpass
6%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
48%
29
1
Ancient
0%
3
11
Inferno
14%
21
1
Dust II
60%
10
3
Nuke
43%
14
2
Vertigo
60%
5
8
Overpass
33%
3
11
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
20
Ancient
46%
46
1
Inferno
56%
27
2
Dust II
28%
18
6
Nuke
73%
22
4
Vertigo
50%
20
1
Overpass
27%
11
13
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- wwlll
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs PACT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and PACT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, Dust II, and victory was secured by PACT. The MVP of this match was fr3nd.
PACT analytics
The team PACT secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PACT were fr3nd contributed 73 kills and bnox contributed 65 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 34124 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PACT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were nEMANHA contributed 76 kills and aVN contributed 63 kills. 33932 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent PACT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments