0 Comments
46
71
9
-25
307
6:13
10
0
Inferno5
-16%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
47%
Ancient
38%
Inferno
26%
Dust II
25%
Overpass
17%
Nuke
17%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
47%
30
1
Ancient
0%
3
11
Inferno
18%
22
1
Dust II
75%
12
3
Overpass
33%
3
11
Nuke
53%
15
2
Vertigo
67%
3
8
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
3
4
Ancient
38%
13
2
Inferno
44%
16
0
Dust II
50%
2
4
Overpass
50%
2
6
Nuke
36%
14
0
Vertigo
67%
6
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
- llwlw
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Conquer by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and Conquer, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Conquer. The MVP of this match was Elfern.
Conquer analytics
The team Conquer secured 19 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Conquer were Elfern contributed 15 kills and Jelo contributed 12 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7598 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Conquer held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 0 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were aVN contributed 13 kills and nEMANHA contributed 10 kills. 5824 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent Conquer from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments