0 Comments
46
71
9
-25
307
6:13
10
0
-16%
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
47%
Ancient
38%
Inferno
26%
Dust II
25%
Overpass
17%
Nuke
17%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
47%
30
1
Ancient
0%
3
11
Inferno
18%
22
1
Dust II
75%
12
3
Overpass
33%
3
11
Nuke
53%
15
2
Vertigo
67%
3
8
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
3
4
Ancient
38%
13
2
Inferno
44%
16
0
Dust II
50%
2
4
Overpass
50%
2
6
Nuke
36%
14
0
Vertigo
67%
6
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
- llwlw
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Conquer by the Bo3.gg Team
Conquer on Inferno Analysis
Conquer demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Conquer on Inferno were Elfern, who contributed 15 kills, and Jelo, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7598 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Conquer held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 0 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno included aVN, who contributed 13 kills, and nEMANHA, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5824 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Conquer from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments