160
212
27
-52
342
22:32
35
8
Vertigo5.5
-9%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- —
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
73%
Ancient
67%
Nuke
50%
Overpass
33%
Mirage
20%
Inferno
18%
Vertigo
17%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
73%
11
3
Ancient
0%
3
11
Nuke
50%
14
2
Overpass
33%
3
11
Mirage
47%
30
1
Inferno
18%
22
1
Vertigo
50%
4
8
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ancient
67%
3
1
Nuke
0%
0
1
Overpass
0%
1
1
Mirage
67%
3
0
Inferno
0%
0
2
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwll
- ll
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs 163ON by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and 163ON, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Vertigo, and victory was secured by 163ON. The MVP of this match was FL4MUS.
163ON analytics
The team 163ON secured 54 out of 54 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Vertigo. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 163ON were FL4MUS contributed 53 kills and sstiNiX contributed 51 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22457 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 163ON held their ground firmly, successfully defending 26 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 0 out of 54 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were Cjoffo contributed 37 kills and DiMKE contributed 34 kills. 18436 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent 163ON from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments