0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
104.491
Galil kills on a map
41.8171
M4A1 kills on a map
114.491
M4A1 kills on a map
94.491
Assists on a map
10.084.4098
Player score (round)
35261011
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
55%
Nuke
25%
Vertigo
23%
Mirage
14%
Anubis
5%
Ancient
3%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
4
1
Nuke
38%
8
1
Vertigo
83%
6
1
Mirage
60%
5
3
Anubis
58%
12
0
Ancient
70%
23
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
55%
11
1
Nuke
63%
8
4
Vertigo
60%
10
1
Mirage
46%
13
5
Anubis
53%
15
5
Ancient
73%
11
7
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwww
- llwww
Info
Match analysis of ThunderFlash vs ARCRED by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ThunderFlash and ARCRED, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by ARCRED. The MVP of this match was Get_Jeka.
ARCRED analytics
The team ARCRED secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ARCRED were Get_Jeka contributed 19 kills and SynyX contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8186 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ARCRED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ThunderFlash analytics
The team ThunderFlash managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ThunderFlash were AdrieN contributed 16 kills and Skitt contributed 11 kills. 6085 of total damage by ThunderFlash could not prevent ARCRED from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ThunderFlash struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments