Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
186.4849
USP kills on a map
41.6074
Speed Round (sec)
00:21s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35761011
Player score (round)
38591011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
67%
Nuke
62%
Mirage
50%
Anubis
21%
Inferno
2%
Ancient
2%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
33%
3
1
Nuke
0%
0
51
Mirage
50%
18
7
Anubis
47%
19
11
Inferno
52%
21
13
Ancient
47%
30
9
Vertigo
29%
17
7
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
0
Nuke
62%
26
5
Mirage
0%
0
61
Anubis
68%
22
3
Inferno
50%
18
23
Ancient
45%
22
21
Vertigo
29%
14
25
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Solid vs ODDIK by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Solid and ODDIK, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, and victory was secured by ODDIK. The MVP of this match was WOOD7.
ODDIK analytics
The team ODDIK secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ODDIK were WOOD7 contributed 44 kills and naitte contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16236 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ODDIK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Solid analytics
The team Solid managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Solid were destiny contributed 33 kills and xureba contributed 21 kills. 13741 of total damage by Solid could not prevent ODDIK from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments