0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:27s
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.83.9
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
49.616.3
Trades on a map
7.983.4876
Assists on a map
10.074.3808
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38721011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
63%
Inferno
57%
Nuke
39%
Overpass
22%
Mirage
14%
Ancient
10%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
83%
24
2
Inferno
77%
13
11
Nuke
47%
34
9
Overpass
0%
0
58
Mirage
32%
25
28
Ancient
60%
20
12
Vertigo
47%
17
15
Last 5 maps
Anubis
20%
10
21
Inferno
20%
5
27
Nuke
86%
14
5
Overpass
22%
9
13
Mirage
46%
13
7
Ancient
70%
20
2
Vertigo
50%
14
12
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs Fluxo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and Fluxo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Fluxo. The MVP of this match was zevy.
Fluxo analytics
The team Fluxo secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fluxo were zevy contributed 19 kills and chay contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7960 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fluxo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were Gafolo contributed 17 kills and doc contributed 15 kills. 7040 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent Fluxo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments