0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
113
Smoke thrown on a map
1514.5022
M4A1 kills on a map
154.4189
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
76.916.3
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:33s00:36s
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3014
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
14.23.6
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3014
AWP kills on a map
126.4049
AWP damage (avg/round)
74.321.6
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
72%
Vertigo
53%
Dust II
31%
Nuke
13%
Inferno
8%
Anubis
6%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
42
Vertigo
53%
19
4
Dust II
45%
11
4
Nuke
69%
36
1
Inferno
50%
16
11
Anubis
44%
18
18
Ancient
57%
21
12
Last 5 maps
Mirage
72%
25
3
Vertigo
0%
0
34
Dust II
76%
21
6
Nuke
56%
18
11
Inferno
42%
19
9
Anubis
38%
24
8
Ancient
55%
42
1
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs GUN5 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and GUN5, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Nuke, Anubis, Dust II, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was story.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 33 out of 57 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were story contributed 56 kills and MUTiRiS contributed 51 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23559 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 managed to secure 24 out of 57 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GUN5 were Easy contributed 41 kills and tN1R contributed 41 kills. 19976 of total damage by GUN5 could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments