Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:26s
Smoke thrown on a map
3114.6931
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.82
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:56s00:37s
Player score (round)
34921011
Player score (round)
35761011
Player score (round)
37031011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
56%
Vertigo
50%
Anubis
38%
Nuke
35%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
10%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
56%
9
17
Vertigo
50%
16
1
Anubis
62%
13
14
Nuke
68%
28
3
Dust II
33%
3
0
Ancient
65%
17
10
Mirage
0%
0
43
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
1
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Anubis
100%
1
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Dust II
0%
0
2
Ancient
75%
4
0
Mirage
0%
0
2
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and FAVBET, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was story.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were story contributed 24 kills and rmn contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11008 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FAVBET analytics
The team FAVBET managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FAVBET were j3kie contributed 27 kills and Smash contributed 23 kills. 9781 of total damage by FAVBET could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FAVBET struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments