Nuke
13 - 7
Inferno
11 - 13
Dust II
13 - 7
Rhyno Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

18

5

+11

114

5:2

8

1

8.2

+30%

18

18

7

0

80

0:0

4

0

6.1

-6%

13

18

8

-5

63

1:1

3

0

5.3

-12%

12

21

4

-9

58

1:7

3

1

4.8

-16%

10

18

3

-8

51

3:4

0

0

4.7

-27%

Total

82

93

27

-11

366

10:14

18

2

5.8

-6%

FAVBET Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

13

4

+16

109

5:2

8

2

9.1

+48%

18

19

7

-1

87

5:2

5

0

6.7

+8%

17

17

10

0

87

2:2

5

0

6.4

+8%

15

16

4

-1

55

2:2

2

0

5.6

-17%

14

19

7

-5

64

0:2

5

0

5.2

-13%

Total

93

84

32

+9

402

14:10

25

2

6.6

+7%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Rhyno vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team

FAVBET on Inferno Analysis

FAVBET demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FAVBET on Inferno were t3ns1on, who contributed 29 kills, and mAriX, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9654 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Rhyno on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Rhyno, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Rhyno on Inferno included Ag1L, who contributed 29 kills, and krazy, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8779 total damage, Rhyno couldn't prevent FAVBET from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Rhyno struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date