Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:25s
USP kills on a map
61.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
24.74.8
USP kills on a map
51.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
16.14.8
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:32s00:36s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5628
Smoke thrown on a map
1814.5022
Smoke thrown on a map
1814.5022
Eco wins full buy
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
40%
Inferno
22%
Ancient
19%
Dust II
17%
Nuke
13%
Vertigo
10%
Anubis
6%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
40%
5
9
Inferno
62%
29
1
Ancient
48%
21
11
Dust II
67%
6
4
Nuke
63%
24
1
Vertigo
40%
10
12
Anubis
67%
12
10
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
8
Inferno
40%
5
1
Ancient
67%
9
0
Dust II
50%
2
5
Nuke
50%
8
0
Vertigo
50%
2
6
Anubis
73%
11
0
Info
Match analysis of Rhyno vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rhyno and FAVBET, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Dust II, Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by Rhyno. The MVP of this match was Ag1L.
Rhyno analytics
The team Rhyno secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rhyno were Ag1L contributed 57 kills and krazy contributed 51 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25586 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rhyno held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FAVBET analytics
The team FAVBET managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FAVBET were t3ns1on contributed 54 kills and mAriX contributed 48 kills. 23202 of total damage by FAVBET could not prevent Rhyno from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FAVBET struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments