Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
156.4049
Speed Round (sec)
00:24s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
45873
Player score (round)
39731010
Player score (round)
35461010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
36%
Vertigo
28%
Inferno
17%
Nuke
16%
Mirage
13%
Anubis
8%
Ancient
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
31%
13
17
Vertigo
52%
44
12
Inferno
80%
5
69
Nuke
49%
59
6
Mirage
63%
59
15
Anubis
48%
54
27
Ancient
61%
71
12
Last 5 maps
Dust II
67%
3
6
Vertigo
80%
5
14
Inferno
63%
16
1
Nuke
33%
12
8
Mirage
50%
20
4
Anubis
40%
5
23
Ancient
64%
14
4
Info
Match analysis of Permitta vs TSM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Permitta and TSM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, and victory was secured by TSM. The MVP of this match was Altekz.
TSM analytics
The team TSM secured 26 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TSM were Altekz contributed 34 kills and acoR contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15686 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TSM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Permitta analytics
The team Permitta managed to secure 16 out of 42 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Permitta were mASKED contributed 26 kills and bnox contributed 25 kills. 13496 of total damage by Permitta could not prevent TSM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Permitta struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments