Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
133.4
GLOCK kills on a map
4.22221.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
22.24.1
Tec-9 kills on a map
2.11111.3014
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
13.33.6
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
20.14.1
Smoke thrown on a map
16.888914.5022
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.74.1
Tec-9 kills on a map
2.11111.3014
USP damage (avg/round)
14.84.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
50%
Nuke
17%
Inferno
15%
Ancient
5%
Dust II
4%
Vertigo
4%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
50%
14
6
Nuke
67%
3
22
Inferno
38%
8
2
Ancient
47%
17
3
Dust II
40%
5
0
Vertigo
62%
13
5
Mirage
43%
7
11
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
46
Nuke
50%
20
6
Inferno
53%
19
2
Ancient
42%
12
27
Dust II
36%
11
0
Vertigo
58%
26
6
Mirage
43%
14
15
Info
Match analysis of OG vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between OG and AMKAL, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Vertigo, Dust II, and victory was secured by AMKAL. The MVP of this match was Chr1zN.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AMKAL were topo contributed 46 kills and Forester contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19915 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
OG analytics
The team OG managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for OG were Chr1zN contributed 47 kills and F1KU contributed 44 kills. 22904 of total damage by OG could not prevent AMKAL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments