Ended
1
OG
1 - 2
AMKAL
Full stats

0 Comments

Dust II
17 - 19
Vertigo
13 - 0
Inferno
13 - 6
OG Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

4

4

+9

145

3:0

4

1

10.0

+55%

7

5

3

+2

74

1:1

2

0

6.4

+7%

6

4

1

+2

62

1:1

2

1

6.0

-1%

3

6

2

-3

57

0:0

0

0

4.5

-13%

3

5

1

-2

38

1:1

0

0

4.3

-22%

Total

32

24

11

+8

377

6:3

8

2

6.2

+5%

AMKAL Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

5

2

+5

93

1:1

3

0

8.2

+27%

6

7

0

-1

69

2:1

1

0

6.2

-7%

4

8

2

-4

58

0:2

1

0

4.9

-18%

1

7

5

-6

40

0:0

0

0

4.3

-30%

3

5

1

-2

38

0:2

0

0

4.3

-9%

Total

24

32

10

-8

297

3:6

5

0

5.6

-7%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of OG vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team

OG on Inferno Analysis

OG demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 6 out of 9 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for OG on Inferno were Chr1zN, who contributed 13 kills, and Nexius, who added 7 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 3395 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, OG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AMKAL on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AMKAL, as they managed to secure 3 out of 9 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AMKAL on Inferno included topo, who contributed 10 kills, and Forester, who added 6 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 2676 total damage, AMKAL couldn't prevent OG from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date