0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
176.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
68.621.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.22
AWP kills on a map
186.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
73.321.6
Deagle kills on a map
41.6964
Kills on a map
35.6417.5558
Damage (avg/round)
152.41939.7
Eco wins full buy
1
Damage (total/round)
63273
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
75%
Mirage
N
67%
Vertigo
57%
Nuke
54%
Inferno
50%
Dust II
N
18%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
1
Inferno
0%
0
1
Dust II
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
75%
4
10
Mirage
33%
6
5
Vertigo
57%
7
11
Nuke
54%
13
2
Inferno
50%
12
2
Dust II
82%
11
1
Ancient
0%
0
21
Info
Match analysis of NASA vs Falcons by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between NASA and Falcons, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by NASA. The MVP of this match was aybeN.
NASA analytics
The team NASA secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NASA were aybeN contributed 34 kills and dukiiii contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9282 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NASA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Falcons analytics
The team Falcons managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Falcons were Maka contributed 22 kills and Keoz contributed 11 kills. 6890 of total damage by Falcons could not prevent NASA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Falcons struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments